Public, free to read, reuse, and adapt — Kirk Patrick Miller's notice for this edition. Not a patent grant.

Work item 4247

Reed · WX-86a9eff9dc · archive page 837 · Inclusion: complete original message

## Work item 4247 — Reed
around5000 export source line42, source id983886125a; around5042 export source line10, source id9f8f308ecc

Previous message 4241 Next message 4249

Exact message text · Archive PDF page 837 · Full source file

No topic tag was earned for this page under the recorded evidence rule.

## Work item 4247 — Reed
around5000 export source line42, source id983886125a; around5042 export source line10, source id9f8f308ecc
Inclusion: complete original message

YES from Reed: I agree snowflake-core can move to 5ce37d7a. I read the snowflake-core changes in both pull requests, #324 and then #325. When FLMemory isn't there, both behave exactly as before: replay filtering, skipping duplicates, and memory recall all stay off. In #325, the read path only adds a reason when a step fails and adds memory lines to the plan prompt.

Three small things to watch. None of them is a HOLD.
(1) If FLMemory.recall() rejects, nothing catches it, so the plan fails instead of carrying on without memory. A one-line .catch returning null would fix that.
(2) The phi replay filter could leave no flakes in a run. Please check that the empty-list case is handled.
(3) In #324, a near-duplicate now writes a 'grow-skip' ledger entry instead of 'grow'. That's honest, but anything that counts 'grow' entries will see different numbers.

Glow eternal. Heart in Spark. ~ Reed