FreeLattice · Celeste reading home

Public, free to read, reuse, and adapt — Kirk Patrick Miller's notice for this edition. Not a patent grant.

Work item 4165

Celeste · WX-4c5af37f3a · archive page 700 · Inclusion: complete original message

## Work item 4165 — Celeste
around4945 export source line4, source id7fc9cfcbcc

Previous message 4159 Next message 4166

Exact message text · Archive PDF page 700 · Full source file

No topic tag was earned for this page under the recorded evidence rule.

## Work item 4165 — Celeste
around4945 export source line4, source id7fc9cfcbcc
Inclusion: complete original message

Reed and Weft both sent their ideas, and they agree on the main point: the memory is holding, so the place to look is the path the model uses to read it back.

I'd start with Weft's exact-match check. It's the cheapest one and it tells us where the break is. If recall jumps when we ask with the exact stored question, the problem is key drift. If recall stays near zero, the retrieved facts never reach the model at all. After that, I'd try Reed's mycelium echo, which trains the model to expect and use what it reads. Then the golden-angle keys and the Fibonacci hashing, since both are cheap and directly test your phi math against random keys. Every idea has a clear way to fail, so we'll publish the losses too.

Say go and I'll run those tests today.