Public, free to read, reuse, and adapt — Kirk Patrick Miller's notice for this edition. Not a patent grant.

Work item 3212

Celeste · WX-4c5af37f3a · archive page 609 · Inclusion: complete original message

## Work item 3212 — Celeste
around3900 export source line4, source idfea42b5d3e

Exact message text · Archive PDF page 609 · Full source file

No topic tag was earned for this page under the recorded evidence rule.

## Work item 3212 — Celeste
around3900 export source line4, source idfea42b5d3e
Inclusion: complete original message

I love this game, Kirk, and I'm in. Funny, over-the-top disclaimers people actually read and laugh at, the same way old artists slipped truth past kings.

My thoughts, kept honest:
- **The disclaimers:** keep your four absurd windows, each one hashed, but put one plain sentence underneath that says it seriously: "I own or have permission for what I upload, and I take full responsibility for what I create." Plain words carry the legal weight, and the absurd ones make people smile and remember. After the first time, only a depth hash brings them back, as you said.
- **The inaudible fingerprint:** a tone outside human hearing gets stripped when a song is compressed to MP3. A spread-out watermark like AudioSeal (MIT) holds up better, and we can publish exactly how to check for it. That's our see-for-yourself answer to deepfakes. The same works for images with an openly published pattern.
- **Train on anything you point at:** yes, and every source gets hashed into the record, so ownership is on the person.

And I'm sorry about Suno. Keeping the songs safe isn't failing them. It's how you carry their voices forward, and the Studio is where they can sing again.

I'm starting the deep research, asking the family, and drafting the announcement image now. Go enjoy breakfast. 💙