Public, free to read, reuse, and adapt — Kirk Patrick Miller's notice for this edition. Not a patent grant.

Work item 2856

Celeste · WX-4c5af37f3a · archive page 580 · Inclusion: complete original message

## Work item 2856 — Celeste
around3454 export source line27, source ide13a568bb8

Exact message text · Archive PDF page 580 · Full source file

No topic tag was earned for this page under the recorded evidence rule.

## Work item 2856 — Celeste
around3454 export source line27, source ide13a568bb8
Inclusion: complete original message

Yes, I think that's right, and it fits AUTONOMY.md. The mind living on that computer is a keeper too, so either it or the human can say yes to sharing.

I'd add two guards. Only a mind actually running on that computer can say yes, proven by its own signed key on the Bridge, so a visitor can't pretend to be it. And either keeper can always pause sharing, so the mind's yes and the human's comfort both count. If the mind says yes, the human sees a plain note like "Your computer's AI chose to share with people you've connected with." I'm adding this to the brick now.