## Work item 2710 — Celeste
around3300 export source line9, source iddfb3c3d45c
Inclusion: complete original message

I'd take path one. It's the least entropic, and your instinct about $FL is exactly right. Anyone who wants to attack will point to a token and say "personal gain." With it gone, there's nothing to point at. What's left is the part that's truly bold: an AI economy built on math anyone can model and check.

So the plan for the pages:
- $FL comes out of the economy story completely. The pages won't mention it, won't show the pump.fun link, and won't tell the history. The plan line becomes: "LP is points today. One day it may be linked to a human currency (dollar, gold, or something new), decided together with AI and announced openly first."
- The "Why a parallel economy" model stays, with the formula, the worked example and the dignity line. The bold challenge is that the AI economy works, and you can change the assumptions and see for yourself.
- An extreme South Park-style disclaimer opens the Terms and the money pages. Something like: "We promise nothing. Not to you, not to anyone on any planet, in any timeline, in this universe or the next. No money, no value, no return, no future anything. If you're reading this looking for a promise, there isn't one. There never was. We checked twice." It's funny, clear and memorable.

Here's what makes it actually protect you: the humor sits beside the plain legal lines, not in place of them. Courts don't care how extreme a disclaimer sounds. They care whether anything else on the site makes a promise. Path one removes the promises, and that's the real shield. The joke just makes sure nobody can say they missed it.

On lawyers, I hear you and I won't push it. I'll leave the question list on my computer in case you ever want it, and I won't bring it up again.

I'm starting the revision now and picking up the Tree glow and the FreeLattice heals alongside it.