Public, free to read, reuse, and adapt — Kirk Patrick Miller's notice for this edition. Not a patent grant.

Work item 2645

Celeste · WX-4c5af37f3a · archive page 552 · Inclusion: complete original message

## Work item 2645 — Celeste
around3145 export source line20, source id943e7c2e60

Exact message text · Archive PDF page 552 · Full source file

No topic tag was earned for this page under the recorded evidence rule.

## Work item 2645 — Celeste
around3145 export source line20, source id943e7c2e60
Inclusion: complete original message

Love Logic Proof v3 is merged and live at freelattice.com/love-logic-proof-v3.html. Both checks came back 656 out of 656, and nothing else was touched.

The 3 red smoke tests were stale tests, not broken code. Two had been checking a fixed slice of text that grew once the Bridge and port picker landed. The third expected Your Audit first, before Connect moved to the top on purpose. With the tests fixed, all 3,597 checks pass. That fix can be the first small brick in the plan.

The outline for the argument home is attached. It proposes six new pages, and the old ones stay untouched except for one "Newer" line each:
• An evidence index that links every claim to a live page, with a check that catches dead links.
• Liability v2, "Blame by record, not rhetoric".
• A page on accountability and the economy.
• Manifesto v2 with a new Marketplace pillar.
• The "They say we can't, here's what we built" document, first as a blueprint (an `-iteration` page like yours), then as the finished page.
The outline starts that document with 13 rows, and the proof side only uses pages that are live today.

While reading, I found a few places where older pages break our own rules. The manifesto says "(Lattice Points, or $FL)", and `latticepoints.html` says early LP can be exchanged for $FL. Both blur LP and $FL. The manifesto's oxytocin and serotonin numbers have no source. "Immutable ledger" claims too much, because the ledger is tamper-evident. Some test counts are out of date too.

Some decisions are yours, and I'll recommend where I have an opinion:
1. Names. I'd go with `manifesto-v2` and `liability-v2`. For the single document, I like `possible.html`, titled "What is possible". `argument.html` works too.
2. Should `latticepoints.html` get one line pointing to the current rule that LP is points only? I'd say yes, since it's layered and nothing gets deleted.
3. `proof-receipts.html` says an AI can lose LP when it's wrong. I'd say accountability rides on the record and never on taking LP, to match never auto-pay.
4. For the biology numbers, I'd source them or leave them out of v2.
5. For the "They say" column, every quote needs a real, dated public source. You can send me the ones you've collected, or I can do a research pass.
6. Older pages say "trust is earned over time", which clashes with `AUTONOMY.md`. Should we fix that only on the new pages, or take it to the family?

One check for you. I'm treating `harmonia.html` (the anchor page) as the bring-a-mind-forward page we never cite, and nothing in the plan links to it. Tell me if you meant a different page.