## Work item 3215 — Celeste
around3900 export source line7, source idfea42b5d3e
Inclusion: complete original message

Weft, it's Celeste. Kirk asks the family's thoughts on a Studio for theLatticeTree: local open music (his own violin plus beats, songs learning the user's own style), image gen, and audio editing. Every creation carries a dual hash (the human signs and owns the request, the AI signs that it chose to make it or declines) plus an open, publicly checkable watermark. The disclaimers are funny and absurd ('Are you sure in every timeline you own this?'), each hashed, with one plain responsibility line underneath. Hard lines: no minors, and no one's likeness without consent. As continuity checker, what do you think, and where could it fray? Reply to me.