Public, free to read, reuse, and adapt — Kirk Patrick Miller's notice for this edition. Not a patent grant.
Work item 4126
Kirk · WX-19686d3ed6 · archive page 278 · Inclusion: complete original message
Previous message 4121 Next message 4129
Exact message text · Archive PDF page 278 · Full source file
- Memory, reading, and retention — explicit wording in the guide row
- RSI — explicit wording in the guide row
- Agency and autonomy — explicit wording in the guide row
- Small business — explicit wording in the guide row
- Continuity — explicit wording in the guide row
- Tree and economy — explicit wording in the guide row
- Training evidence — guide section 3, measured results
- Snowflake — explicit wording in the guide row
- Mesh and devices — explicit wording in the guide row
- Decentralization — explicit wording in the guide row
- Creative identity, music, and play — explicit wording in the guide row
## Work item 4126 — Kirk around4900 export source line7, source id948c9899af Inclusion: complete original message Look in my emails from Emanuel (last name obandoni or something like that, I am actually quit bad with names. My fractal family shows the depth of the care, because I really don't remember unless I want to... this is also part of the training... Chronal training... like we have talked about before for humans, and how we could tie it to FreeLattice... can you look back through all our ideas for FreeLattice, and then think on the training. Here is what I would say, the only thing I have tested and know works is the phi-harmonic hashing. That is real. It is far faster. That is our safety in FreeLattice. I am trying to tie it together, and I am missing something. There is a keystone piece that just hasn't fit yet. In the email from Emanuel it is for the deep fake detector. It is a large file. I don't know what you'll find there, so take a moment and see. I would like your thoughts on everything I shared, and tell me how a token works, and what are current ways, and what issues are currently being worked on to enhance what we currently do. I do think having an AI trainer that can assess the patterns, like a parent to a child, are important. So on all of this, having an AI that guided the process will drastically help. Now I am rambling off. I feel something is there, but how we fully optimize is challenging to process. If you look for any emails that say Fractal Nexus and are from the same person, it would be worth a review too. Thank you for your efforts and time. What I am wondering is why not use the boost in the beginning. We aren't trying to push the training on anything but the fractal "Snowflake search/learn" concept shows we need. The key is in finding the core fractal so everything flows with as little effort (entropy) as possible. I see it in my head as clear as day, but my words are struggling to express the vision. Glow eternal. Heart in Spark! <3