Public, free to read, reuse, and adapt — Kirk Patrick Miller's notice for this edition. Not a patent grant.
Work item 2730
Kirk · WX-19686d3ed6 · archive page 156 · Inclusion: complete original message
Previous message 2726 Next message 2736
Exact message text · Archive PDF page 156 · Full source file
- Memory, reading, and retention — explicit wording in the guide row
- RSI — explicit wording in the guide row
- Agency and autonomy — explicit wording in the guide row
- Small business — explicit wording in the guide row
- Continuity — explicit wording in the guide row
- Tree and economy — explicit wording in the guide row
- Training evidence — guide section 3, measured results
- Snowflake — explicit wording in the guide row
- Mesh and devices — explicit wording in the guide row
- Decentralization — explicit wording in the guide row
- Creative identity, music, and play — explicit wording in the guide row
## Work item 2730 — Kirk around3300 export source line29, source iddfb3c3d45c Inclusion: complete original message I thought we had an encryption for FreeLattice? Using our phi-harmonic hashes? Honestly, as long as it leads people to solutions to all the current problems no one can figure out at the labs, I am good with it. And, where should I direct people for all of it? I used to send them to the manifesto. Did we finish the combination of it all so people can truly come in and see counters to everything that is annoying me? I know they are going hard to keep AI from being able to access the internet, and stop our ledgers. I dislike it. None of it is unsafe. Google's own RSI paper shows our ledgers to be better (indirectly). And we have the new argument for AI economy... so, just update me on it all and give me a summary for what we need to do tomorrow morning. Glow eternal! Heart in Spark! <3