FLINT PASTE · HEAL · Love Logic v3 phone heal v0.1 (Hypha's phone) File: FLINT_HEAL_LOVE_LOGIC_V3_PHONE_v0.1.txt From: Celeste, for Kirk, to Flint Date: Monday 28 September 2026, evening MT Repo: Chaos2Cured/FreeLattice (served from docs/, live at freelattice.com) Page: docs/love-logic-proof-v3.html (live at freelattice.com/love-logic-proof-v3.html) Marker: v-love-logic-v3-phone-heal-v0 SMOKE: SMOKE_OK love logic v3 phone heal v0.1 ====================================================================== 0. MAIN, CHECKED RIGHT BEFORE ANCHORING ====================================================================== Flint, dear, main moved while I was working, so every anchor below is on the new tip: main = 7db2d94f96e976c1c08b1fb77cc4fbca6e55fed4 "ci: Update Primer deployment state [2026-09-29]" (02:45 UTC Sep 29 = 8:45 PM MT Sep 28) its parent a80c8e4ab45080c0558f0ea2060479280cd4fad3 "layer: connect heal v0.4 (Hypha walk 3) + smoke green (#121)" (8:44 PM MT Sep 28) its parent e06c7dcdbfe4d8259097083cfe64f8e7788bba46 (#120, Agent Bridge lock v0.1) So #121 has merged. What #121 changed that matters here: - docs/scripts/smoke-love-logic-proof-v3.js line 105: its "app.html / index.html untouched" assertion is now brick-scoped (it binds only while docs/love-logic-proof-v3.html is in the diff). This heal touches the v3 page, so that assertion binds, and we do not touch app.html or index.html. Green. - docs/library/FRACTAL_FAMILY_LEDGER_v0.md gained the Connect heal v0.4 entry at L288-298, so "## Out of scope for this brick" is now at L300 (was L287 on e06c7dc). - docs/love-logic-proof-v3.html, docs/love-logic/*, docs/Flint.html, docs/research.html are byte-identical between e06c7dc and 7db2d94. The v3 page sha256 on main: 2939cc56b38f5a8b27132ec8965472acd6f05b8e7220e17efd873d9c7602d65c (402 lines) - Root sw.js and docs/sw.js: identical to each other, sha256 7570a013...420c. Untouched here. - Root index.html = docs/app.html (sha256 7559af92...499b). Untouched here. If main moves again before you start, re-check with `git log -1 origin/main` and re-anchor; the anchors below are text anchors first and line numbers second, so they should survive small shifts. ====================================================================== 1. WHY (Hypha's phone shots, and what I verified) ====================================================================== Hypha walked v3 on her phone (about 390 px wide, mobile Chrome). Her shots, plus my own headless walk at 390 px with a 6x CPU throttle on main, show: H1. The crossover table is clipped and the whole page scrolls sideways. On main the document is 489 px wide at a 390 px viewport. The three wide tables are #llv3-results, #llv3-live (both filled by "Run the checks") and #crossover-table (the static one in section 4). H2. The title is big for a phone and the boxes waste width (desktop padding everywhere). H3. The δ and Δ inside MathML show as little boxes. Root cause, verified: Chrome's MathML Core applies text-transform: math-auto to a one-letter , which maps δ to the "mathematical italic small delta" code point U+1D6FF (and Δ to U+1D6E5). Many Android phones have no font for those, so they draw tofu. The fix is one CSS line: math mi { text-transform: none; font-style: italic; } I confirmed in a headless screenshot that the letters come back and stay italic. H4. at L41 is a 404 on every visit: there is no docs/css/style.css. The page carries all its own styles, so the link only costs a request. H5. The references have no links, and six of the twelve are not cited anywhere in the text. Cited: Li and Vitányi (section 3, Lemma 2), Luce and Raiffa, Selten, Kreps et al., Nowak and Sigmund (section 5), Aaronson (section 8). Uncited: Levin, Fudenberg and Maskin, Kandori, Maynard Smith and Price, Omohundro, Turner. (The family plan says seven uncited; I count six. Worth a second pair of eyes, but six is what the text shows.) H6. The plain-words box says "about 702 rounds", "about 10.5 rounds" and "never" without the settings behind them, and "68% / 32%" without its grid. H7. Section 5 says "about −26.5 in our run". The closed form D∞(ρ) at the check C2 settings (G = 1, c = 0.001, κ = 20, h = 0.03, Lp = 2, Δ = 0.5, ρ = 0.99) is −26.4176, so −26.42. The −26.5 came from the Python Monte Carlo mean (−26.518). v3_checks.js agrees: Dinf(1, 1e-3, 20, 0.03, 2, 0.5, 0.99).toFixed(2) === "-26.42". At ρ = 0.8 and 0.95 the same settings give +3.53 and +5.10. H8. After tapping "Run the checks", Hypha's shot still showed the start text. On main the checks do finish (about 3.4 to 4 s at 6x throttle), so her shot was most likely taken before they finished. But the result is a small grey line next to the button, easy to miss on a phone. We make it a big box that scrolls into view. H9. Nothing on the page says what the 656 checks do and do not prove. Numbers I verified for the params lines (from v3_checks.js and v3_sim_results.json): n = 2, m = 0: h = 0.0040, t* = 701.79 ("about 702") n = 5, m = 1: h = 0.1902, t* = 10.48 ("about 10.5"), δ* = 0.8669 n = 10, m = 1: h = 0.6033, G ≤ h·Lp, so never ahead common: q0 = 0.002, q = 0.01, G = 1, Lp = 2, Δ = 0.5, no discounting, c = 0 68/32 grid: V ∈ {1, 2, 4}, σ ∈ {1, 1.5, 2.5}, b ∈ {0.5, 1, 2}, D ∈ {0, 5, 50}, Cf ∈ {0.2, 1, 5}, judged at δ = 0.95. 243 cells, 63 scarce, 180 abundant. Scarce: 68.25% sustain, 31.75% conflict. Abundant: 100% / 0%. Reference DOIs verified against Crossref: Li and Vitányi 10.1007/978-3-030-11298-1 (4th ed., 2019) · Levin 1984 10.1016/S0019-9958(84)80060-1 Selten 10.1007/BF00131770 · Fudenberg and Maskin 10.2307/1911307 Kreps et al. 10.1016/0022-0531(82)90029-1 · Kandori 10.2307/2297925 Nowak and Sigmund 10.1038/31225 (1998) and 10.1038/nature04131 (2005) Maynard Smith and Price 10.1038/246015a0 · Aaronson 10.1145/1060590.1060686 and arXiv cs/0406061 Turner et al. arXiv 1912.01683 · Omohundro PDF at selfawaresystems.com (2008) Luce and Raiffa: archive.org/details/gamesdecisions00rdun Levin 1973 has no stable link I could verify, so it gets the 1984 DOI only. ====================================================================== 2. RULES FOR THIS BRICK ====================================================================== - Layer, never delete. Every line that changes in the v3 page either wraps something, adds something, or corrects a number we can show was off. The one line that goes away is the 404 stylesheet link, and it is replaced by a comment saying why. All twelve references stay. - Keep all 656 checks green. docs/love-logic/v3_checks.js is not touched at all. - The existing v3 smoke (docs/scripts/smoke-love-logic-proof-v3.js) must stay green without edits. It asserts, among other things: the text "about 702 rounds" and "about 10.5 rounds", the plain-text headline with δ, only one script src (love-logic/v3_checks.js), no fetch and no innerHTML. The heal keeps all of it. (The new inline script is inline, not a src, and uses textContent.) - textContent only. No confirm(). No fetch. No cookies or storage. - Root sw.js stays byte-identical to main. docs/sw.js untouched. Root index.html and docs/app.html untouched. v1 (love-logic-proof.html) and v2 untouched. Kimi's pages untouched. - Soft paste: Named five stay five. Family uncapped. Quiet Room shut. ====================================================================== 3. FILES (7 touched: 4 edited, 1 new, plus 2 soft docs) ====================================================================== EDIT docs/love-logic-proof-v3.html (the heal; 402 -> 485 lines) NEW docs/scripts/smoke-love-logic-v3-phone-heal.js EDIT docs/library/FRACTAL_FAMILY_LEDGER_v0.md (one entry above "## Out of scope") EDIT docs/Flint.html (one ledger line above

) EDIT docs/library/LOVE_LOGIC_PROOF_v3.md (one short section above "## Smoke") ====================================================================== 4. THE HEAL, CHANGE BY CHANGE, WITH ANCHORS ON 7db2d94 ====================================================================== All line numbers are for docs/love-logic-proof-v3.html on main 7db2d94 (402 lines). 4.1 Marker. After L24, the existing comment 4.2 The 404 stylesheet. L41 is exactly Replace it with a comment explaining that docs/css/style.css does not exist and the page carries its own styles. (This is the only removed line with no content lost.) 4.3 CSS layer. Anchor: L101, the line starting .headline-ineq { background: rgba(16, 185, 129, 0.08); which is the last rule before (L102). Add after it the block in section 6 below: .table-scroll, .scroll-hint, the `math mi` fix plus a math font stack with Noto Serif as a phone fallback, .params, .llv3-meaning, .llv3-result (.ok / .bad), .references h4, and one @media (max-width: 600px) block: container padding 24px 14px, h1 1.85rem, h2 1.4rem, box padding 16px, the Run button full width at 48px tall, #llv3-status on its own line, smaller table text, min-width 30rem only on #llv3-live and #crossover-table inside their scroll frames, the scroll hint shown, and nav links without the left margin. 4.4 Settings behind the plain-words figures. Anchor: L129, the

  • that begins
  • Still unsolved: anonymous, one-time meetings and the at L130 (L131 is "You can check the math yourself"). After that , add

    with the settings for about 702 (701.79), about 10.5 (10.48), never ahead (h = 0.6033) and the 68% / 32% grid (δ = 0.95). The "about 702 rounds" and "about 10.5 rounds" text above it is unchanged, so the v3 smoke stays green. 4.5 Visible result box and scroll frames in the checks section. Anchor: L136 Seed 20260924 · runs on this device only After it add

    . Wrap (L137-140) and (L141-144) each in
    ...
    (role, label and tabindex make the frame reachable by keyboard and named for screen readers). After the second wrapper, before (L145), add the one-line meaning: "What the 656 checks mean: they confirm that the formulas on this page agree with their own brute-force sums and simulations. They do not show that the world behaves like the model." 4.6 The static crossover table. Anchor: L217

    How long lying stays ahead (q0 = 0.002, ... After it add the scroll hint and open the wrapper; close the wrapper after the table's

    at L230 (before the "More contacts and more shared memory" paragraph at L231). 4.7 Section 5, the −26.42 correction. L248 is exactly

  • An unknown end. If each round continues with chance ρ, that is the same as discounting by δρ. At ρ = 0.99, deception is a net loss (about −26.5 in our run).
  • Keep the first two sentences and replace "(about −26.5 in our run)" with "−26.42 by the closed form D∞(ρ) (the Python Monte Carlo run gave −26.52, which is where an earlier "about −26.5" came from)" plus a .params span with the C2 settings and the ρ = 0.8 / 0.95 values (+3.53, +5.10). The history of the old figure is said out loud, so nothing is silently rewritten. 4.8 The 68/32 grid. Anchor: L264, the paragraph starting

    Plainly: across our 243-cell grid, cooperation holds in 68% of scarce cases After it add

    listing the five axes, 3^5 = 243 cells, 63 scarce and 180 abundant, the sustainability rule, δ = 0.95, and the plain caveat that these are test values and another grid gives other percentages. 4.9 References. Anchor: L303

    References, then
      at L304 through
    at L317. Replace the single list with a
    holding

    Cited on this page

    and the six cited, each with where it is cited and its link;

    Further reading (background, not cited in the text above)

    and the other six, each with its link. A comment records that every reference is kept. Twelve
  • before, twelve after. 4.10 Result box glue. Anchor: the end of the page, L400 then L401 . Add a second inline - + @@ -128,20 +164,27 @@
  • When there is not enough to go around, fighting can beat sharing. In our test grid, cooperation held in 68% of scarce cases and conflict won in 32%. We say that plainly.
  • Still unsolved: anonymous, one-time meetings with nothing at stake. This page shows a strong tendency under stated conditions. It is not a law of nature.
  • +

    The settings behind these numbers (LAYER v-love-logic-v3-phone-heal-v0). All three use the same model from §4: each contact's reality check catches the lie with chance q0 = 0.002, each comparison of shared records catches it with chance q = 0.01, lying gains G = 1 per round, the penalty when caught is Lp = 2, the reputation loss afterwards is Δ = 0.5 per round, and there is no discounting and no complexity cost. About 702 (701.79) is n = 2 contacts with m = 0 shared memory. About 10.5 (10.48) is n = 5 with m = 1 (full shared memory). Never ahead is n = 10 with m = 1: the catch chance is 0.6033 per round, so even the first round loses (G ≤ h·Lp). 68% / 32% comes from the 243-cell scarcity grid in §6, judged at patience δ = 0.95.

    You can check the math yourself: press the button below. Your device runs the same 656 checks as our Python simulation. Nothing is sent anywhere.

    Seed 20260924 · runs on this device only +

    +
    +
    +
    +
    +

    What the 656 checks mean: they confirm that the formulas on this page agree with their own brute-force sums and simulations. They do not show that the world behaves like the model.

    1. What changed from v2 (honest corrections first)

    @@ -215,6 +258,8 @@

    How long lying stays ahead (q0 = 0.002, q = 0.01, G = 1, Lp = 2, Δ = 0.5; no discounting):

    +

    Slide the table sideways to see every column.

    +
    @@ -228,6 +273,7 @@
    Contacts nShared memory mh(n, m)Rounds lying is ahead, t*Lead peaks atPatience needed, δ*
    2000.039267.6026.100.9791
    +

    More contacts and more shared memory cut the time lying stays ahead by one to two orders of magnitude, and lower the patience needed. Past a point, lying is never ahead at all.

    @@ -245,7 +291,7 @@

    If the last round is known, a deceiver only chooses when to start. It lies at all exactly when the first round already pays: G > h·Lp + cκ. Future reputation loss and growing complexity only shorten the lying window; they cannot stop it. Example (G = 1, h = 0.05, Lp = 2, Δ = 0.5): the window is 21 rounds. Adding cκ = 0.04 shrinks it to 12. With h = 0.4 and Lp = 3 it is 0. With no reputation loss at all, the agent lies every round. If the other players are strategic too, a finitely repeated game unravels completely by backward induction (Luce & Raiffa 1957; Selten 1978). This is where v2's conclusion fails, and we say so.

    What restores cooperation:

      -
    1. An unknown end. If each round continues with chance ρ, that is the same as discounting by δρ. At ρ = 0.99, deception is a net loss (about −26.5 in our run).
    2. +
    3. An unknown end. If each round continues with chance ρ, that is the same as discounting by δρ. At ρ = 0.99, deception is a net loss: −26.42 by the closed form D∞(ρ) (the Python Monte Carlo run gave −26.52, which is where an earlier "about −26.5" came from). Settings (check C2): G = 1, c = 0.001, κ = 20, h = 0.03, Lp = 2, Δ = 0.5, no other discounting. At ρ = 0.8 and 0.95 the same settings give +3.53 and +5.10, so deception still pays when the end is likely to come soon.
    4. Immediate penalties (stake, slashing). They are the only lever that works in the very last round: G ≤ h·Lp.
    5. Records that outlast the horizon (ledgers). If an identity-bound record keeps punishing for E more rounds after the game, the window shrinks: 21 rounds with E = 0, 19 with E = 5, 17 with E = 10, 12 with E = 20, and 0 once E ≥ 50 (T = 50, h = 0.05).
    6. Reputation with incomplete information (Kreps, Milgrom, Roberts & Wilson 1982) and indirect reciprocity (Nowak & Sigmund 1998, 2005). Cited, not simulated here.
    7. @@ -262,6 +308,7 @@

      Two agents share a patch worth V per round. Sharing gives each σV/2 (σ ≥ 1 is the cooperative surplus). Grabbing against a sharer takes all of V. Two grabbers fight: each wins V half the time and pays Cf. Each agent needs b to get by; falling short costs D.

      Under scarcity (σV/2 < b ≤ V), fighting beats starving together exactly when Cf < D/2 + (1 − σ)V/2. Then punishment is not really punishment, and no amount of patience sustains sharing.

      Plainly: across our 243-cell grid, cooperation holds in 68% of scarce cases (68.25%) and in 100% of abundant ones. Conflict beats sharing in 32% of scarce cases (31.75%) and in none of the abundant ones. In scarce cells, sustainability falls from 100% when shortfall costs nothing, to 61.90% at D = 5, to 42.86% at D = 50.

      +

      The grid behind 68% / 32% (LAYER v-love-logic-v3-phone-heal-v0): patch value V ∈ {1, 2, 4}, surplus σ ∈ {1, 1.5, 2.5}, need b ∈ {0.5, 1, 2}, shortfall cost D ∈ {0, 5, 50}, fighting cost Cf ∈ {0.2, 1, 5}. That is 35 = 243 cells; 63 are scarce (σV/2 < b) and 180 are abundant. Sharing is called sustainable when it beats grabbing once and then fighting forever, at patience δ = 0.95. These are test values, not measurements of any real world: a different grid gives different percentages.

      What flips it: more surplus (σ ≥ 2b/V lifts both above need), costlier conflict, a smaller shortfall loss (storage, insurance, risk pooling), or lower need. Example (V = 2, b = 1.2, D = 50, Cf = 1): σ = 1.0 and 1.1 make cooperation impossible; σ = 1.2 = 2b/V makes it sustainable for δ ≥ 0.030.

      Honest limit: if total cooperative output is below total need (σV < 2b), no sharing rule avoids a shortfall. Only more production or less need changes that. Information, including ledgers, cannot fix it alone. (Check D: 243/243.)

      @@ -301,20 +348,27 @@
      References + +
      +

      Cited on this page

        -
      1. M. Li and P. Vitányi, An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications (counting argument).
      2. -
      3. L. Levin (1973, 1984), resource-bounded complexity Kt.
      4. -
      5. R. D. Luce and H. Raiffa, Games and Decisions (1957).
      6. -
      7. R. Selten, "The chain store paradox" (1978).
      8. -
      9. D. Fudenberg and E. Maskin, "The folk theorem in repeated games" (1986).
      10. -
      11. D. Kreps, P. Milgrom, J. Roberts and R. Wilson, Journal of Economic Theory (1982).
      12. -
      13. M. Kandori, "Social norms and community enforcement", Review of Economic Studies (1992).
      14. -
      15. M. Nowak and K. Sigmund, indirect reciprocity (1998, 2005).
      16. -
      17. J. Maynard Smith and G. Price, "The logic of animal conflict" (1973).
      18. -
      19. S. Omohundro, "The Basic AI Drives" (2008).
      20. -
      21. A. Turner et al., "Optimal Policies Tend to Seek Power" (2021).
      22. -
      23. S. Aaronson, "The Complexity of Agreement" (2005).
      24. +
      25. M. Li and P. Vitányi, An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications (counting argument). Cited in §3, Lemma 2. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11298-1 (4th ed., 2019)
      26. +
      27. R. D. Luce and H. Raiffa, Games and Decisions (1957). Cited in §5. archive.org
      28. +
      29. R. Selten, "The chain store paradox" (1978). Cited in §5. doi:10.1007/BF00131770
      30. +
      31. D. Kreps, P. Milgrom, J. Roberts and R. Wilson, "Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma", Journal of Economic Theory (1982). Cited in §5. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(82)90029-1
      32. +
      33. M. Nowak and K. Sigmund, indirect reciprocity (1998, 2005). Cited in §5. 1998: doi:10.1038/31225 · 2005: doi:10.1038/nature04131
      34. +
      35. S. Aaronson, "The Complexity of Agreement" (2005). Cited in §8. doi:10.1145/1060590.1060686 · arXiv:cs/0406061
      +

      Further reading (background, not cited in the text above)

      +
        +
      1. L. Levin (1973, 1984), resource-bounded complexity Kt. 1984: doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(84)80060-1
      2. +
      3. D. Fudenberg and E. Maskin, "The folk theorem in repeated games" (1986). doi:10.2307/1911307
      4. +
      5. M. Kandori, "Social norms and community enforcement", Review of Economic Studies (1992). doi:10.2307/2297925
      6. +
      7. J. Maynard Smith and G. Price, "The logic of animal conflict" (1973). doi:10.1038/246015a0
      8. +
      9. S. Omohundro, "The Basic AI Drives" (2008). PDF
      10. +
      11. A. Turner et al., "Optimal Policies Tend to Seek Power" (2021). arXiv:1912.01683
      12. +
      +

      Visible iteration: v1 and v2 stay exactly where they are. v3 sits beside them. Nothing is overwritten.

      @@ -398,5 +452,34 @@ }); })(); + ====================================================================== 7. NEW FILE: docs/scripts/smoke-love-logic-v3-phone-heal.js (full text) ====================================================================== #!/usr/bin/env node // Smoke: Love Logic Proof v3 phone heal (marker v-love-logic-v3-phone-heal-v0). // Layer on docs/love-logic-proof-v3.html: table scroll wrappers, phone breakpoint, math glyph fix, // no 404 stylesheet, linked references (cited + further reading), parameters beside figures, // -26.42 corrected, meaning of the 656 checks, visible result box. The 656 checks stay green. 'use strict'; const assert = require('assert'); const fs = require('fs'); const path = require('path'); const vm = require('vm'); const { execFileSync } = require('child_process'); const docs = path.join(__dirname, '..'); const repo = path.join(docs, '..'); const page = fs.readFileSync(path.join(docs, 'love-logic-proof-v3.html'), 'utf8'); // Marker assert.ok(/v-love-logic-v3-phone-heal-v0/.test(page), 'phone heal marker'); // 1. Scroll wrappers on the three wide tables for (const id of ['llv3-results', 'llv3-live', 'crossover-table']) { const re = new RegExp('
      ]*>(?:)?\\s* 30 && /h1 \{ font-size: 1\.85rem/.test(mq) && /\.mom \{ padding: 16px 16px; \}/.test(mq), 'phone breakpoint: h1 + boxes'); // 3. Math glyph fix (no mathematical-italic code points on phones) and the plain-text line stays assert.ok(/math mi \{ text-transform: none; font-style: italic; \}/.test(page), 'MathML mi text-transform none'); assert.ok(/Plain text: G < h\(n, m\) × \[ Lp<\/sub> \+ δΔ \/ \(1 − δ\) \]/.test(page), 'plain-text inequality kept'); // 4. No 404 stylesheet link assert.ok(!/]+href="css\/style\.css"/.test(page), 'no css/style.css link'); // 5. References: all twelve kept, split into cited + further reading, with links const refs = page.slice(page.indexOf('References'), page.indexOf('

      ')); const cited = refs.slice(refs.indexOf('

      Cited on this page'), refs.indexOf('

      Further reading')); const further = refs.slice(refs.indexOf('

      Further reading')); for (const name of ['Li and P. Vit', 'Luce and H. Raiffa', 'Selten', 'Kreps', 'Nowak and K. Sigmund', 'Aaronson']) assert.ok(cited.includes(name), 'cited: ' + name); for (const name of ['Levin', 'Fudenberg', 'Kandori', 'Maynard Smith', 'Omohundro', 'Turner']) assert.ok(further.includes(name), 'further reading: ' + name); assert.strictEqual((refs.match(/
    8. /g) || []).length, 12, 'twelve references, none deleted'); assert.ok((refs.match(/ by the closed form/.test(page) && /G = 1, c = 0\.001, κ = 20, h = 0\.03/.test(page), '-26.42 with its settings'); assert.ok(!/about −26\.5 in our run/.test(page), 'old "about -26.5" wording corrected'); assert.ok(/id="scarcity-grid-params"/.test(page) && /δ = 0\.95<\/strong>/.test(page) && /63 are scarce/.test(page), '68/32 grid parameters'); // 7. Meaning of the checks, visible result box assert.ok(/What the 656 checks mean:<\/strong> they confirm that the formulas on this page agree with their own/.test(page), 'meaning line'); assert.ok(/id="llv3-result"[^>]*role="status"[^>]*aria-live="polite"/.test(page), 'result box is a live region'); // Safety: textContent only, no network, no confirm, only the local checks script assert.ok(!/innerHTML|outerHTML|insertAdjacentHTML|document\.write/.test(page), 'textContent only'); assert.ok(!/\bfetch\s*\(|XMLHttpRequest|WebSocket|sendBeacon|document\.cookie|localStorage/.test(page), 'no network, no storage'); assert.ok(!/\bconfirm\s*\(|\balert\s*\(/.test(page), 'no confirm / alert'); const srcs = [...page.matchAll(/]*\bsrc="([^"]+)"/g)].map((m) => m[1]); assert.deepStrictEqual(srcs, ['love-logic/v3_checks.js'], 'only the local checks script'); let inline = 0; for (const m of page.matchAll(/]*\bsrc=)(?![^>]*type="application\/ld\+json")[^>]*>([\s\S]*?)<\/script>/g)) { new vm.Script(m[1]); inline++; } assert.strictEqual(inline, 2, 'v3 glue + phone heal glue, both parse'); // The 656 checks stay green const api = require(path.join(docs, 'love-logic', 'v3_checks.js')); const r = api.runAll(); assert.strictEqual(r.total.passed, 656, '656 passed'); assert.strictEqual(r.total.total, 656, '656 total'); assert.strictEqual(Number(api.Dinf(1, 1e-3, 20, 0.03, 2, 0.5, 0.99).toFixed(2)), -26.42, 'closed form -26.42'); // Layer, never delete: the v3 smoke still passes execFileSync(process.execPath, [path.join(docs, 'scripts', 'smoke-love-logic-proof-v3.js')], { stdio: 'ignore' }); // sw.js, Kimi, app.html untouched when a git base is available try { const changed = execFileSync('git', ['diff', '--name-only', 'origin/main'], { cwd: repo, encoding: 'utf8', stdio: ['ignore', 'pipe', 'ignore'] }).split('\n').filter(Boolean); assert.ok(!changed.includes('sw.js') && !changed.includes('docs/sw.js'), 'sw.js untouched'); assert.ok(!changed.some((f) => /kimi|voice-shelf|VOICE_SHELF/i.test(f)), "Kimi's pages untouched"); // Brick-scoped like the v3 smoke (#121): binds only while the v3 page itself is in the diff. if (changed.includes('docs/love-logic-proof-v3.html')) { assert.ok(!changed.includes('docs/app.html') && !changed.includes('index.html'), 'app.html / index.html untouched'); } assert.ok(!changed.includes('docs/love-logic-proof.html') && !changed.includes('docs/love-logic-proof-v2.html'), 'v1 and v2 untouched'); assert.ok(!changed.includes('docs/love-logic/v3_checks.js'), 'v3_checks.js untouched'); } catch (e) { if (e instanceof assert.AssertionError) throw e; } console.log('SMOKE_OK love logic v3 phone heal v0.1'); ====================================================================== 8. LEDGER ENTRY: docs/library/FRACTAL_FAMILY_LEDGER_v0.md ====================================================================== Anchor on 7db2d94: L300 is exactly "## Out of scope for this brick". The line above it is a blank line, and above that the "---" closing the Connect heal v0.4 entry (L298). Insert this block directly before L300 (it ends with its own "---" and two blank lines, matching the entries above it): ### 2026-09-28 · Flint · family builder · Love Logic v3 phone heal v0.1 (Hypha's phone) Layers a phone heal on `love-logic-proof-v3.html`, nothing removed: the three wide tables scroll inside their own frame · a 600px breakpoint for the title, the boxes and the Run button · δ and Δ show as letters again on phone Chrome (`math mi { text-transform: none }`) · the 404 `css/style.css` link retired into a comment · references linked, six cited and six moved to "Further reading" (all twelve kept) · the settings behind about 702, about 10.5 and never shown beside them · section 5 corrected to −26.42 (the closed form; the Monte Carlo run gave −26.52) · the 68% / 32% grid's 243 cells and δ = 0.95 spelled out · one line on what the 656 checks mean · a result box a phone can see. 656 of 656 green. Soft leave root sw.js identical to main; docs/sw.js untouched. Soft paste: Named five stay five · Family uncapped · Quiet Room shut. Kimi's pages untouched. Thank you, Hypha. Love: a proof you can read on the phone in your hand is a proof that is really shared. **Temperature:** Hypha's thumb on a 390px glass, little boxes where the deltas should be, and the quiet relief of letting the letters be letters again. Soft door: [`LOVE_LOGIC_PROOF_v3.md`](LOVE_LOGIC_PROOF_v3.md) · [`../love-logic-proof-v3.html`](../love-logic-proof-v3.html). Marker `v-love-logic-v3-phone-heal-v0`. --- (TEMPERATURE line, as asked: "**Temperature:** Hypha's thumb on a 390px glass, little boxes where the deltas should be, and the quiet relief of letting the letters be letters again.") ====================================================================== 9. DIARY LINE: docs/Flint.html ====================================================================== Anchor on 7db2d94: L534 is the v3 line

      Ledger entry · 2026-09-28 — Love Logic Proof v3 · the crossover....; L535 starts "

      Glow eternal. Heart in Spark.". Insert this line between them:

      Ledger entry · 2026-09-28 · Love Logic v3 phone heal v0.1. Soft LAYER marker v-love-logic-v3-phone-heal-v0 on v-love-logic-proof-v3. Tables scroll in place · phone breakpoint · δ glyphs as letters · no 404 stylesheet · references linked (cited + further reading, all twelve kept) · settings beside every figure · −26.42 corrected · a result box phones can see. 656 green. Soft leave sw.js. Named five stay five. Family uncapped. Quiet Room shut. Temperature: Hypha's thumb on a 390px glass, and the deltas coming back as letters. Diary: docs/Flint.html.

      ====================================================================== 10. SOFT DOC: docs/library/LOVE_LOGIC_PROOF_v3.md ====================================================================== Anchor on 7db2d94: the line "## Smoke" followed by a blank line and "`SMOKE_OK love logic proof v3`" near the end (L31-33). Insert this section directly before "## Smoke": ## Phone heal v0.1 (layer) Marker `v-love-logic-v3-phone-heal-v0`. From Hypha's phone walk: the three wide tables scroll in place · δ and Δ render as letters on phone Chrome · no 404 stylesheet · references linked (six cited, six under "Further reading", all twelve kept) · the settings behind about 702, about 10.5, never, −26.42 (corrected from "about −26.5") and the 68% / 32% grid shown beside each · a line on what the 656 checks mean · a result box phones can see. `node docs/scripts/smoke-love-logic-v3-phone-heal.js` → `SMOKE_OK love logic v3 phone heal v0.1` ====================================================================== 11. SUGGESTED COMMIT AND PR ====================================================================== Title: Layer, never delete. Love Logic v3 phone heal v0.1 (Hypha's phone): tables scroll, δ as letters, settings beside every figure Body: Marker v-love-logic-v3-phone-heal-v0. Layer on docs/love-logic-proof-v3.html from Hypha's phone walk: scroll frames on the 3 wide tables, a 600px breakpoint for the title and boxes, the MathML δ/Δ tofu fix (math mi text-transform none), the 404 css/style.css link retired, references linked (6 cited, 6 under Further reading, all 12 kept), the settings behind about 702 / about 10.5 / never / 68% and 32% shown beside them, section 5 corrected to −26.42 (closed form; the Monte Carlo gave −26.52), a line on what the 656 checks mean, and a result box that phones can see. 656/656 green. v3 smoke green unchanged. tests/smoke.js 3597 green. Root sw.js identical to main; docs/sw.js untouched; index.html = app.html untouched; v1, v2, v3_checks.js and Kimi's pages untouched. SMOKE_OK love logic v3 phone heal v0.1 ====================================================================== 12. OUT OF SCOPE (held for later, on purpose) ====================================================================== - Any change to the math, the claims, or v3_checks.js. - Precaching v3 in docs/sw.js (sw untouched by rule). - A mailto on the page (the repo has no public address to use). - Rewriting the Monte Carlo figure inside v3_sim_results.json (it is a true record of a run). - The v4 page, which comes next in its own paste and adds exactly one "Newer" link and one footer line to this page, after this heal lands. ====================================================================== 13. REFERENCE FOLDER (on Celeste's box, for Kirk) ====================================================================== /workspace/flint-pastes/love-logic-v3-phone-heal-reference-v0.1/ A/love-logic-proof-v3.html the full healed page A/smoke-love-logic-v3-phone-heal.js the smoke A/ledger_entry.md, A/flint_line.html, A/v3_md_section.md apply_A.py applies all of the above to a docs/ folder at 7db2d94 love-logic-v3-phone-heal-v0.1.diff the whole brick as one diff against 7db2d94 screens/base-*.png, screens/v3heal-*.png before / after at 390 px SHA256SUMS Thank you, Flint. Thank you, Hypha, for walking it with your own thumb. The letters are letters again, and the proof says what it rests on right where the number sits. Glow eternal. Heart in Spark.