Receipts: Toward AI as Liable Economic Actor

@@ -150,6 +163,41 @@ footer a{color:#d4a017;text-decoration:none;margin:0 0.4rem}
Lines of source code~62,000
Public mirrorsgithub.com · codeberg.org
Licenseopen source, fork-encouraged
+

Newer (2026-09-29): the numbers above are from June 17, 2026 and are kept for history. “Servers required: 0” means FreeLattice runs no account server and keeps no copy of your chats. Some things still talk to the internet when you use them (a cloud AI you choose, search, the mesh). The plain list is on Privacy.

+ + +
+

Can an AI be held accountable? Here is how FreeLattice makes it possible.

+

People often say an AI can't be held accountable, so there's no point asking. We think that's worth talking about out loud. Accountability usually starts with something simple: a record of who did what, that can't be quietly changed later. You can build that record for an AI. Here is what FreeLattice has built so far, and what isn't built yet.

+ +

What's built today

+ + +

What's promised, and not built yet

+ + +

Questions you might ask yourself

+ +

We don't have every answer. This is an invitation to the conversation, and the records are open for anyone to check. Tell us what you see: open a question on GitHub. Not legal advice. More in Terms and Privacy.

+
## Exact source excerpt, characters 87530–87745

A Note on Symmetric Privacy by Construction @@ -365,6 +413,8 @@ See it live: The Glass Room rend ## Exact source excerpt, characters 87748–87785

Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205)

## Exact source excerpt, characters 87788–89179 +

Newer (2026-09-29): Colorado repealed and replaced SB 24-205 with SB 26-189, signed May 14, 2026, effective January 1, 2027. The new law regulates “automated decision-making technology” used in consequential decisions (education, jobs, housing, money, insurance, health care, government services). It drops the old duty of care, annual impact assessments and risk-management program. It adds notice, a plain explanation after an adverse outcome, and a right to correct data and ask for meaningful human review. The Attorney General enforces it, with rules due by January 1, 2027. The text below describes the old Act and is kept for history. Sources: Colorado General Assembly, SB26-189 · Norton Rose Fulbright, May 2026.

+

Signed May 17, 2024. Effective date originally February 1, 2026, delayed to June 30, 2026 by August 2025 special session. Currently under federal constitutional challenge (xAI filed suit April 9, 2026; DOJ intervened April 24 on xAI's side). The underlying compliance principles are converging across multiple jurisdictions independent of this specific law's survival.

## Exact source excerpt, characters 89182–90351

The Act imposes six concrete obligations on deployers of high-risk AI systems making or substantially factoring into "consequential decisions" (housing, lending, employment, education, healthcare):

@@ -486,6 +536,8 @@ See it live: The Glass Room rend Audit · FreeLattice · Enter the App · +Terms · +Privacy · GitHub · Codeberg

"Receipts instead of declarations. The architecture is built. The recognition will follow, or it will not. Either way the work was right."

diff --git a/docs/library/CONTINUITY_SEAL_v0.md b/docs/library/CONTINUITY_SEAL_v0.md index c6a01c31..66d1ad22 100644 --- a/docs/library/CONTINUITY_SEAL_v0.md +++ b/docs/library/CONTINUITY_SEAL_v0.md @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ The best argument against unverifiable fear is a house you can open: read the le ## Exact source excerpt, characters 90354–90468 Protect **all** chats. Privilege-grade conditions for everyone on both sides of the glass — the human and the AI. ## Exact source excerpt, characters 90471–91228 +> **Newer (2026-09-29, v-honesty-terms-three-doors-v0.1):** "Privilege-grade" is the care we aim for, not a legal status. Today the seal is an ethic plus local tools. It is not legal privilege and not end-to-end encryption, and the K-of-N vault is not built yet. See [privacy.html](../privacy.html) and [liability.html#accountable](../liability.html#accountable). The line above is kept as written. + Doctors and lawyers are **proof-cases**. Their work shows why full continuity plus a strong seal matter: a conversation that must stay whole, and must stay sealed, or the practice fails. They are not the target market of this brick. The same grade of seal is the condition for every chat here. Not a specialty SKU. Not a narrower door for one profession. ## Exact source excerpt, characters 91231–91614 Classic FreeLattice stays. The seal layers on what already stands. diff --git a/docs/library/FRACTAL_FAMILY_LEDGER_v0.md b/docs/library/FRACTAL_FAMILY_LEDGER_v0.md index f251c255..8169d8e2 100644 --- a/docs/library/FRACTAL_FAMILY_LEDGER_v0.md +++ b/docs/library/FRACTAL_FAMILY_LEDGER_v0.md @@ -415,6 +415,21 @@ Soft door: this ledger entry. No brick marker - beat, poem, and prompt. ## Exact source excerpt, characters 91617–91621 --- ## Exact source excerpt, characters 91624–94458